Lost worlds and ports of call

Month: April 2022

Additional thoughts on Vinyl

Many years ago, sometime in the distant past known as the 1980s, I used to buy music in the format of vinyl records. At that time I owned a record player, as well as a radio player that also played cassette tapes. I also had a cassette player in my car (until my brother wrecked it), a battered white Renault 4 that struggled up the many hills and mountains in western Norway, but I think I owned less than five cassette tapes. Even then, I didn’t own a vast amount of records, as I was a teenager and had no means to earn money except when relatives gave me money as gifts. I don’t recall exactly how much they cost, but also my tastes back then (as now), were narrow, so it wasn’t a case of running out a buying tons of records. Of the few records I bought back then, I still have them all except for two. One disappeared somewhere, and I have no idea where. The other, warped and bent I sadly discarded. Still, back then records were the main staple for music fans, even though CDs were starting to emerge on the market. They were also reasonably priced. It was an nice experience to stand in front of a record bin and flip through the records, although 99 out of a 100 were ones I’d never consider buying.

Between 1988 and 2016 I don’t think I bought a single vinyl record. By then I’d moved to the US, switched to CDs as I didn’t own a record player; my first CD was U2’s Unforgettable Fire, a gift from my wife. Around 2000, with computers now the mainstay of my life, I started to amass a digital library of music. I thought, at the time, that this was the perfect format: portable, hard to lose or break, and tough to steal.

Vinyl, though, has a strange and enduring appeal.

I’ve bought a few albums in vinyl since 2016. Not that many, as I find it hard to justify some of the costs of records these days. If you buy them new (as long as they’re not imports), the price averages $25 or higher. Wait a few months or years, and the price increases by 50 to 100% or more (unless they are rare Record Store Day editions, bought by entrepreneurs and resold at three or four times the original value; I recently saw Longwave’s first album listed for $250, an insane price. Records have become as collectable as first edition books, despite their fragility.

Meanwhile, the loss of CD space in whatever remains of stores that sell physical copies of music has diminished to the point where buying a CD of the kind of music I like (at least where I live), is next to impossible. I remember the rows upon rows of CDs in the Borders bookstore in the Arboretum in Austin, TX, now long gone. I remember Tower Records on the drag in Austin, as well as a smaller record store along the drag by UT also long gone—vast CD collections, and few actual vinyl records. In San Antonio, there briefly was a small store that sold CDs, but it folded, and if you check out the big box stores you’d be hard pressed these days to find actual CDs in the quantity offered only a few years ago. I don’t know if digital music drove people away from CDs, or the closure of decent music stores drove people over to digital and away from physical CDs. Since most CDs in stores these days are ones I’d never buy as they’re not to my taste, if I want to buy any CDs now, I buy it online either direct from the record company, or from a major online retailer (you know the one).

However, in the 2020s, for some strange reason (nostalgia, eh?), vinyl records are back in a big way. Once in a while, to sustain this strange habit, I head over to a local record store in San Antonio—Hogwild Records—a store that somehow still survives in today’s market. There I sometimes find records I like, but I have to admit that it’s tough to buy records for $25 to $45 and not find a digital download as part of the bargain, given that I could pay $9.99 or $11.99 to download the music and have available on phone, iPod, car, and not need to worry about physical space.

Then again, I do like the physical aspects of things—books, CDs, records. I do listen to music on my computer while working or (yes, I still have one) iPod while flying, and via phone in my car when driving. Transferring music from vinyl to digital isn’t always the same (or as convenient) as using a one-time code to download the music. Having the record and playing it on a record player is fine (though sometime tedious and an exercise in caution to avoid scratches.

Having a digital copy as part of the deal was something I’d come to expect when buying vinyl a few years ago, and now it’s rare to see this option included with records. Recently I bought three records, and just one had the code. Another time I bought three records, and none had the code. Just today I bought two albums and only one had a code to download the music. It annoyed me greatly, I have to admit, and almost made me want to go back to spending $9.99 or $11.99 for the digital copy through such mega-companies as Apple and Amazon.

Records take up space. CDs take up some space, but less space compared to the massive squares of vinyl packages (given that these days many albums are thicker than in the past, having extra packaging and heavier material). A few days ago I repurposed a deep bookshelf to hold only records, and it made me realize—having seen pictures of other peoples’ collections—that while I own hundreds of CDs, I only own a handful of records. If I count them all it takes me less than one minute to count a total of 45 albums and one box set. That’s a humbling number. It almost makes me want to bo out and buy a ton more records…except, the price for modern records is such that buy four albums and you’re out over $100. Imagine the amount of money required to build a decent collection these days. Staggering.

Record Store Day Bust

April 23rd 2022 is Record Store Day (RSD), the 15th one, I believe. It’s the first time I tried to participate in this “event,” and it turned out a bust.

The local record store where I shop handles RSD via a lottery. You submit your requests, and if you win they give you a call. I submitted requests for four albums, and received not a single call. They’d delayed opening the store until 3pm, and at 2:50pm I was in a crowded strip mall parking lot. At 2:58pm I was fourth in line, and within one minute of entering the tiny environs of the store there were 20 people or more inside.

I checked the crowded bins for my wants—albums by The Album Leaf, Camera Obscura, The Cranberries, Weyes Blood. Zip. Nada. Bupkis. Camera Obscura’s album is probably local, available only in the UK, not in central Texas. The Cranberries? Well, the store had received some copies, but I was not among the fortunate winners. As for The Album Leaf and Weyes Blood, the had not received any copies. The latter was intended for my daughter, and the others for myself. As far as RSD, no luck for me.

I did pick up albums by Portishead and Wild Beasts; one of which I had in digital format, and the other I had in no format. As luck would have it, the one I had in no format offered digital downloads, while the one I already had, did not.

I’m not sure I’ll participate in another RSD. The idea of limited editions that may of may not be available, combined with my abysmal luck in terms of any lottery system, means it’s probably not worth my time. Am I bothered? Not too much. At least I’m not among the 93 individuals who failed to get a copy of a Taylor Swift 7″—poor souls, they must be heartbroken, their lives ruined.

The Batman Review

I’ve seen The Batman (2022 edition) twice now, all three-plus hours of it. With a few small exceptions, I think that this installment in the large and varied Batman movies stands as the best cinematic Batman yet. Prior to this movie, I used to think that, as a character, the first Michael Keaton movie turned both Batman and Bruce Wayne into an understandable being, not a joke like the 1960s TV show. In contrast, as a cinematic experience, the Christian Bale trilogy stood above all the rest. Meanwhile, the later movies in-between the Keaton and Bale, the ones with Val Kilmer, George Clooney, and Ben Afleck in the leading role, all were forgettable. This is, as a reminder, simply my opinion.

The 2022 movie is a reboot (again), but it isn’t an origin story. Robert Pattinson’s Batman has been operating for two years in Gotham, but seems to have made little difference in the fight against crime and criminals. Crooks both large and small still operate in the city, the police see Batman as a vigilante, and Batman sees himself only as “vengeance.” Clearly, this movie sets up future sequels, although often sequels are victims of the predecessor’s success.

In terms of the supporting cast, I preferred Anne Hathaway as Catwoman to Zöe Kravitz (although Michelle Pfeiffer remains the best one yet). Hathaway had attitude and presence on the screen, while Kravitz seems almost laconic, too laid back, too invisible. In terms of villains, no one tops Heath Ledger’s Joker, but in this movie the Riddler is far more menacing than the comedic version in the earlier movie, the one played by Jim Carey. (I shudder to think of those earlier movies now, all with big name stars in various roles, and all acting as if they were in the 1960s TV version.) I’m not sold on Andy Serkis’ Alfred, and while I thought Jeffrey Wright was a decent Gordon, Gary Oldman is a far better actor and a far better Gordon. Robert Pattinson’s brooding version is much better than Christian Bale, which bodes well for future installments.

In general, superheroes are tragic figures. Most of them lead two lives. Alter-egos are necessary to keep loved ones from harm, and this means they can’t expect happy lives. Live Superman, they may be invincible, but their loved ones usually are not, and so exposing friends, family, and loved ones would lend their enemies significant advantages. Both Bruce Wayne and Batman remain cut off from happiness; Wayne as a billionaire is guarded less people take advantage of him and his wealth, while Batman must remain behind his mask. When Catwoman appear ( as she has in thee movies), there’s a hint of romance — the Cat and the Bat, as Kravitz says. Would it work? Maybe not. It serves as the typical sexual and emotional tease that’s part of movie and TV-making 101.

These are all fragmentary observations, but having sat through the movie twice, I think I would not mind seeing in a third or fourth time. I don’t think I can say the same for prior versions, though there are snippets here and there in each movie (except for the two Schumacher movies and the later Justice League movies) that are well-made, and if those snippets appear on the TV screen I’ll stick around for a few minutes.

© 2024 Anders Monsen

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

css.php